Solar panel cleaning involves an analysis of cost versus gain, with a collection of system variables like system size, location, panel angle, local labor costs – and of course the potential gains driving annual cleaning events.
Solar panels get dirty, it limits the effectiveness. There is a financial argument on how often relative to cost of cleaning, with some locations saying it isn’t worth it. On Mars, Spirit’s daily energy supply increased by about 30 watt-hours, to about 240 watt-hours from 210 watt-hours, due to a wind event that knocked dust – that’s a 14% boost. On earth, NREL says snow cleans panels amazing due to water’s unique chemistry, and of course rain is great. Some areas have regional pollution so strong, all panels are affected. Do note though, electric utilities and large project owner do pay to clean panels (sometimes they’re not good at it), and if they’re doing it – we need watch.
The ARES Soiling Station measures local soiling loss on a daily basis, has its own onboard cell modem, and is self powered (it’s got two solar cells built in). The station measures irradiance and calculates daily insolation of an ambient soiled large area reference cell (top cell that gets dirty) with another cell that is cleaned daily (notice to the tiny nozzles sticking out above the lower solar cell). This allows the system to project what losses at the site are due to soiling (see below chart from the group of one of their sites). With this data, users can see the financial impact that array cleaning will have on their revenue.
Speaking with pv magazine USA founder Catlin Mattheis said Fracsun initially thought their product wouldn’t be needed in regions with what they assumed would be low soiling values.
We realized the error in this in two ways: the first is that (finance companies and asset owners) having the assurance that one is correct in assuming that no cleaning is necessary has a lot of value. The second thing we realized is that there is not real general rule. Local effects have such an impact that of two east coast sites we monitor one stays clean with summer rains and the other get huge local impacts due to pollen. The locality of soiling loss effects has been the biggest realization through this study by far. I can also speak to arrays in California that are only a few miles from one another but have vastly different soiling profiles.
If you’re a fleet owner, and have many resources with a region monitored by limited O&M teams, you’ll then have a logic – greater percentage of loss – by which to deploy those resources.
Of course though – most of us don’t own tens of thousands of acres worth of solar modules with annual six figure cleaning budgets. This weekend, redditor treynquil posted how he gained 20% electricity output by cleaning his flat solar panels system (below images). This teaches an important lesson – the angle of your panels has an affect. Any angle now high enough to let the water quickly flow off your modules, will lead to polling of rain, and you’ll get dirty corners, or just generally dirty panels. And from Captain Obvious – you can be 100% assured that the big players are cleaning their panels of there is a 20% gain to be had (don’t worry, there isn’t).
Dr. Dan Snowden-Ifft, Chair of the Physics Department at Occidental College, an gentlemen who pushed for the construction of a 1 MW solar plant about a decade ago at the school supplied pv magazine USA with data (available direct from them, with PhD quality analysis available upon request) on their system’s performance related to theory, including information before after after cleaning – as well – giving perspective on when cleaning makes the most financial sense, and when it makes sense to let it go.
This first image is the kicker, with key datapoints located in the upper right corner. Annual cleaning costs assumed at $4,300
And you know, it isn’t always going to be humans cleaning those solar modules – but maybe humans servicing robots that deploy other robots that clean solar panels: